Judge Labour on six targets, Starmer says in major speech

Sir Keir Starmer has set out six pledges which he says will allow voters to hold his government to account, in a major speech outlining his priorities.

The prime minister said his “plan for change”, which includes six targets covering the economy, housebuilding, the NHS, policing, pre-school education and green energy, would “give the British people the power to hold our feet to the fire”.

He described the plan as “ambitious”, saying it would be “an almighty challenge” to hit the targets over the next five years.

However, the Conservatives criticised Sir Keir for not including a “concrete” target on immigration and accused him of watering down a previous promise on decarbonising the electricity grid.

In his speech at Pinewood Studios in Buckinghamshire, Sir Keir acknowledged there would be “trade-offs” and “difficult decisions” required to achieve his aims.

But he said without priorities “you don’t get anything delivered”.

Taking aim at the civil service, the PM said “too many people in Whitehall are comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline”.

The targets – which the government is calling “milestones” – give more detail about how Labour plans to achieve the five “missions” set out in its election manifesto.

The six “milestones”, which the government is aiming to meet by 2029 when the next election is likely to be held, are:

Most of the pledges, including to recruit more police officers and build 1.5 million homes, restate existing commitments.

However, they highlight the areas the government wants to prioritise in the coming years.

The also seek to communicate to voters how they would personally benefit from a Labour government.

While an aim to secure the highest sustained economic growth in the G7 remains, there is now also a promise to raise living standards.

However, the government’s plan does not put a specific numerical target on this, only stating that it will be measured through higher real household disposable income (RHDI) and GDP per capita in every region of the UK.

RHDI is what people have left of their pay and benefits once they have paid tax, while GDP is a measure of the size of the economy.

The Resolution Foundation think tank, which campaigns against poverty, welcomed the focus on living standards but said the target was “not very stretching” and “the bare minimum of any functioning government”.

RHDI has risen in every Parliament since 1955 and GDP per capita has risen in all but two.

Sir Keir faced criticism from both the Conservatives and Reform UK for not including a milestone on migration, with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch claiming the government had “no plan to control numbers”.

In his speech, the PM said the government would reduce both legal and illegal migration, without giving figures.

Taking questions from journalists after, the PM insisted he was not deprioritising the issue but said putting an “arbitrary” cap on migration did not work under the Conservatives.

He said the government had a “serious plan” to get the numbers down, including tackling the smuggling gangs behind small boat crossings.

Sir Keir added that border security was a a “foundational principle” that any government must deliver, while his missions were “on top of that”.

He also denied watering down his party’s previous commitment on green energy.

Labour’s election manifesto promised “zero-carbon electricity by 2030”, while his new milestone sets a target of “at least 95%”.

The government insisted the two statements were consistent.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: “We made the choice originally when we launched the clean power mission that there would always be a strategic backup reserve of gas, and that always meant that there would be a very low percentage, but a percentage nonetheless, of gas.”

Badenoch described Sir Keir’s speech as an “emergency reset”, which “confirms that Labour had 14 years in opposition and still weren’t ready for government”.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said “people want real change instead of a government simply moving the goalposts”.

He said it was “worrying” there was no clear plan on how to ensure people could see a GP when they needed to, adding: “Pledging to bring down waiting lists while neglecting GP services is like robbing Peter to pay Paul.”